A couple of months ago, editors at the Charleston Daily Mail got the ability to blast cannonballs of information directly to people’s smartphones. It surprised me that thousands of people had already OK’d receiving the notifications and how quickly the service continued to grow.
Grover Norquist, whose name is synonymous with no-tax pledges, visited The Charleston Daily Mail editorial board.
Although taxes were a big part of what Norquist discussed, on the accompanying video he begins with a run-down of his time at Harvard.
There was a lively and humorous discussion prior to the start of the video about Norquist’s visit to Burning Man. But I wasn’t sure if that talk was just pre-meeting chitchat or an actual part of his talk with us, so I didn’t hit record. Too bad.
Norquist was in Charleston to talk with conservative state legislators and to talk to editorial boards like ours. (If you got here from Google and aren’t familiar with the paper, our editorial page is fiscally conservative.)
Present for the discussion were me (Brad McElhinny, the editor), opinions editor Kelly Merritt, business editor Jared Hunt and editorial writer and columnist Don Surber.
Here’s a lively 41-minute discussion:
If you’re a regular visitor to dailymailwv.com, you might have noticed a new feature on the right-hand rail.
It’s called “Articles for You,” and it’s meant to serve up stories, editorials and photos based on your stated interests.
This is still a work in progress and might still require some tinkering. For now, have fun playing with it until it settles.
Basically it allows you to pick among recommended topics like “Entertainment,” “Opinion,” and “Local Government” and then serves up content from the saved categories. It seems fairly handy, especially if you are a regular visitor to the site.
Around here we call the new feature “Audience,” and we hope you like it.
I’ve been slogging my way through the 700-some page book “The Bully Pulpit: Theodore Roosevelt, William Howard Taft and the Golden Age of Journalism.“
It’s really interesting but it’s also slow going for me.
There’s a lot of great stuff about the muckrakers, the journalists exemplified by S.S. McClure and the magazine bearing his name.
I just read through a section where McClure hits some turmoil with his business and has a nervous breakdown. I’m not sharing to make light of him, or of workplace stress. Just that it’s an interesting way to deal with the situation — and to compare to the disruption that media companies are facing now.
The failed deal crushed McClure, precipitating a nervous breakdown in April 1900 that propelled him to Europe to undergo the celebrated “rest-cure” devised by an American physician, S. Weir Mitchell. Prescribed for a range of nervous disorders, the rest cure required that patients remain isolated for weeks or even months at a time, forbidden to read or write, rigidly adhering to a milk-only diet. Underlying this regimen was the assumption that “raw milk is a food the body easily turns into good blood,” which would restore positive energy when pumped through the body.
This extreme treatment was among the proliferating regimens developed in response to the stunning increase in nervous disorders diagnosed around the turn of the century. Commentators and clinicians cited a number of factors related to the stresses of modern civilization: the increased speed of communication facilitated by the telegraph and railroad; the “unmelodious clamor” of city life replacing the “rhythmical” sounds of nature; and the rise of the tabloid press that exploded “local horrors” into national news. These nervous diseases became an epidemic among “the ultracompetitive businessman and the socially active woman.”
The stressed out citizens of 1900 have my sympathy, but I wonder how they would have reacted to a rapidly-changing digital age, where information is available at your fingertips at all times, where some startup might be rising to gobble your business model away, where breaking news is measured in minutes rather than days and where push notifications are being lobbed like cannonballs.
Suddenly, I’m thirsty for milk.
Great shooting by Charleston Daily Mail photographer Tom Hindman, who was honored with the West Virginia Press Association’s Photo of the Year award.
The photo was one Tom shot during last summer’s Boy Scout Jamboree in Fayette County, WV. It showed a sea of scouts standing at attention. It was a grabber for us at the time — we played it big on the front page. And the West Virginia Better Newspaper Contest judges (who are journalists from another state) liked it too.
The thing is, this isn’t Tom’s first time being honored for great shots.
3 years in a row http://t.co/dFLDOTWeq4
— TomHindman (@TomHindman) August 10, 2014
Yep, it was Tom’s third straight year to win the Photo of the Year award.
Brilliance, plus consistency.
That photo also placed first in the news feature photo category. Hindman also won best sports photo and placed third for best news photo.
Other Daily Mail staffers did well too. The Charleston Daily Mail was awarded with “General Excellence” for racking up the most points among West Virginia newspapers its size for stories, photos, headlines and designs.
The Daily Mail’s edition marking the state’s 150th birthday was recognized for best single issue.
Daily Mail Editor and Publisher Brad McElhinny won best columnist. Neediest Cases, the newspaper’s annual effort to help those in need during the Christmas season, placed first for service to the community.
In all, the newspaper won 26 awards. The other awards were:
• For Best Lifestyle Columnist, “Chickens in the Road” writer Suzanne McMinn placed first and “Ask the Vet” Allison Dascoli placed second.
• Former Life Editor Monica Orosz placed third for Best Lifestyle Page.
• Former staff writer Candace Nelson placed third for best written news story.
• The staff received second place for best headline, third place for best special sports section, second place for best sports page, and first and second place for best front page.
• Graphic artist Kevin Cade received second and third place for best cartoon or drawing.
• Orosz won second place for best lifestyle feature writing.
• Writers Matt Murphy and Dave Boucher placed third for governmental reporting.
• Business Editor Jared Hunt won third place for coverage of business and labor.
• Photographer Craig Cunningham won second place for feature photography.
• Opinion Editor Kelly Merritt won third place for best editorial page.
• Former editor and publisher Nanya Friend won second place for best columnist.
• Managing Editor Philip Maramba won second place for best newspaper design.
Congrats to everyone for another year of great work.
(Oh, and want to have access to these great pictures and vigorous WV journalism on a regular basis? Subscribe by going here: http://www.charlestondailymail.com/dm/Subscribe or call customer service at 304-348-4800.)
Many thanks to West Virginia journalist Nerissa Young, who swung by the Charleston Daily Mail this week to lead a discussion on freedom of information.
Nerissa is a former reporter at the Register-Herald in Beckley and has taught at Shepherd University, Marshall University and now at Ohio University. She’s also the author of “Mass Communications Law in West Virginia,” which was the hook for what she talked to the Daily Mail news reporters about.
Her discussion provided helpful advice but was equal parts pep talk, reminding reporters that they represent citizens with an interest and a stake in knowing what their government is doing.
It was a good talk, and if you have an interest in open government then be sure to check out Nerissa’s book.
As in any line of work, journalism is susceptible to mistakes. Unlike many, however, ours can happen on the front page where everyone can see it.
On Friday, I was very proud to see our 1A centerpiece celebrating the 45th anniversary of the Apollo moon landing.
It was lovely and had everything — an Apollo astronaut and the American flag on the surface of the moon. But, Charleston, we had a problem.
There was also a lunar rover in the picture. This was not an image from the historic 1969 Apollo 11 moon landing; this was James P. Irwin from the Apollo 15 mission in 1971.
In my position as managing editor, I also wear the hats of design editor and acting graphics editor, the latter of which means I’m mostly responsible for garnering file images for the publication.
We had planned earlier in the week to do a special front for Friday, so I quickly gathered photos from the Associated Press archives for our designer to work with.
Unfortunately, in my search, the image of Irwin was in the same batch of results as the iconic picture of Buzz Aldrin. In my hurry to grab good art, I failed to read all the captions and lumped them all together.
That was my first mistake.
The second mistake came when looking at the proof. I am now one of only a handful of people on staff old enough to remember the Apollo program. I knew the lunar rover did not go up on the first landing, but in my focus on the astronaut, the flag and the lunar module, I didn’t notice the second vehicle that shouldn’t have been there in ’69.
And now it’s part of the permanent record — with a correction forthcoming, of course.
If we’re lucky, aside from the chiding of an eagle-eyed readership, that’s the worst fallout of our mistakes. (The worst usually involves lawyers.) The only salve we can apply is that we get another chance to do a good paper with our next edition and that we will try harder to be more careful in the future.
(Hat tip goes out to reader Patrick Baker who pointed out the error.)
Do you put ‘Family Circus’ on your fridge? Do you love or hate ‘Pearls Before Swine’? Don’t feel complete without the Jumble?
About once a year we take a look at our newspaper syndicated features lineup. Usually that’s prompted by proposed rate increases by the syndicates so we’re assessing what still seems worth the price.
Often, though, we’re just guessing at what’s resonating with readers.
And before I go any farther, here’s a universal truth: different people like different things. In other words, you’re never gonna please everyone.
Still, we’d like to know more about what our readers like, so we invited them to tell us.
In print editions, which is where the comics and puzzles run (sorry Internet readers), we’ve been printing a survey: “Like it a lot,” “It’s OK,” “Hate it” and “Would not notice if it were gone” for each of our current syndicated offerings.
This is not exactly a popular vote. It’s not a “vote one off the island” kind of thing. But I’m interested in seeing any trends. I’m probably most interested in how people reply to “It’s OK” and “Would not notice if it were gone” — those features that just don’t move the needle either way.
It’s just been a few days, but responses have been flowing in steadily.
One thing I’ve learned is that people aren’t shy about saying they miss Beetle Bailey, which was cut late last year because of its high price and advancing age. “Miss Beetle Bailey comic,” commented a retiree from Charleston. Another 69-year-old retiree also pleaded, “Bring back Beetle Bailey.” “What happened to Beetle Bailey??” another asked.
Age has been one factor in written responses, with some older readers saying they are not fans of some of the newer offerings.
“How about some classic Lil Abner or other old comics for your older adult readers instead of this childish jibberish?” suggested an 83-year-old respondent.
“Comics aren’t funny any more except Family Circus,” commented a 63-year-old.
“I am 75 and the new comics do not make sense to me,” a reader commented.
Another reader expressed appreciation for puzzles.
“Crossword and Jumble help me to stay mentally active,” wrote a 77-year-old Campbell’s Creek resident.
Keep ‘em coming and we’ll let you know what more people have to say.
This is Nanya Friend, former editor and publisher of the Daily Mail, who announced her retirement about this time last year.
Hers was one of a slew of retirements we experienced in 2013 – George Hohmann, business editor; Hanna Maurice, editorial page editor; Cheryl Caswell, court reporter; and Monica Orosz, features editor.
Their combined years of newsroom experience tallied well over a century and left those who remained to carry on wondering how we were going to make up for the loss of so much institutional and professional knowledge.
Luckily, none of them retired away from the area. And even more so, they’re still helping us.
From supplying emergency food supplies at the start of the winter water crisis to leaving stores of over-the-counter medications — antacids, pain relievers and such — they’ve continued to keep the newsroom fortified and fit. (George even continues to employ his ace reporting skills as a freelancer covering local city council meetings for us.)
Nanya was kind enough to share with our copy editors her time and wisdom in a headline writing seminar this Sunday. She passed along not only tips for writing good headlines, but her own opinions on what works and what doesn’t and why. (As I later told our copydesk staffers who hadn’t worked with her, “Now you know why we’re the way we are.”)
I told her afterward that she and our former managing editor, the late, great Bob Kelly, cast long shadows in our office and that we often wonder to ourselves what they would do in certain situations.
Truth be told, as the latest occupant of Bob’s office, I still talk to him, bemoaning the state of the world and the industry and asking for clues to life’s puzzles.
But I’m glad to know that the rest of our predecessors are still just a phone call, email or text message away for advice and, in the case of this weekend, real, practical lessons.
While it’s not in the direct, daily contact we enjoyed while they still worked with us, we continue to learn from them in the hopes of carrying on the legacy of excellence that they left us.